Disclosure: Vital Signs Today may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our evidence-based assessments. We are not a medical provider; talk to a clinician before acting on test results.
Quick answer: In the Mito Health vs Function Health debate, both are AI-driven, longevity-focused blood-testing services that test 100-plus biomarkers and hand you an action plan, with Function Health being the more clinically thorough of the two. But if you are choosing among all three, Superpower is the one we point most readers to: it covers 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 counting calculated ratios), gives you 17 plain-language health scores plus an AI concierge, and costs $199 per year, which undercuts both Mito and Function while still delivering a real yearly baseline.
Disclosure: Vital Signs Today may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our evidence-based assessments. We are not a medical provider; talk to a clinician before acting on test results.
| Service | Best for | Pricing | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superpower | Whole-body optimization | ~$179/yr membership | View › |
| Function Health | Annual deep panel | Annual membership | View › |
Mito Health vs Function Health vs Superpower at a glance
| Feature | Mito Health | Function Health | Superpower |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$349/yr | $365/yr | $199/yr ($399 NY & NJ) |
| Biomarkers | 100+ | 160+ | 100+ (~150 with ratios) |
| Draws per year | 1 draw | 2 draws + urinalysis | 1 annual draw |
| Standout | Longevity slant, concierge | 6-month retest, clinician-reviewed | 17 health scores + action plan + AI concierge |
| Best for | Longevity-focused repeat users | Most clinically thorough | Best-value full-body baseline |
Mito Health vs Function Health vs Superpower at a glance
All three services sell the same core promise: skip the rushed annual physical, draw a wide panel of biomarkers once or twice a year, and let software translate the numbers into something you can act on. The differences come down to price, how deep the panel goes, and how good the coaching layer feels.
Here is the short version before we get into each one. Function Health is the most clinically exhaustive and the priciest. Mito Health leans hard into longevity framing and an AI-native experience. Superpower is the value play that still hits the marks most people actually need from a yearly check, and it is the one we recommend for the average health-conscious adult.
Mito Health: the AI-native longevity pitch
What Mito Health does well
Mito Health positions itself as an AI-native clinic in your pocket. It tests 100-plus biomarkers through a standard lab draw at national lab locations, then returns a personalized dashboard, a biological-age style readout, and an action plan, usually within about a week. The product is built around longevity and healthspan rather than disease diagnosis, which is the same lane Superpower and Function play in.
Where Mito Health falls short
Mito sits in a crowded middle. Per-kit and membership pricing in this category moves often, so check Mito directly for current pricing rather than trusting a number you read in a comparison post. Our honest read: Mito is a fine product, but it does not clearly out-test Function or clearly under-price Superpower, which makes it a harder service to recommend first. If the AI-coaching experience is the thing you care about most, it is worth a look. If you care about price-per-biomarker or clinical depth, the other two make a stronger case.
Function Health: the most thorough panel
What Function Health does well
Function Health is the depth champion of this group. For $365 per year you get 160-plus biomarkers, two blood draws per year, a urinalysis, and a 6-month retest built into the membership. That second draw matters more than people expect: a single snapshot tells you where you stand, but two draws six months apart start to show you trend lines, which is the whole point of tracking biomarkers over time.
Where Function Health falls short
You pay for that thoroughness. At $365 it is the most expensive of the three, and its AI chat layer is newer and less mature than the coaching experience some competitors lead with. For a data-hungry user who genuinely wants 160-plus markers and twice-yearly draws, Function is the right call. For someone who wants a solid annual baseline without the premium, it can be more service than they need. We dig deeper into this in our Function Health review and our breakdown of Function Health cost.
Superpower: the value pick that still covers the bases
Why we recommend it most often
Superpower is a $199-per-year membership that buys you one comprehensive annual blood draw covering 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 once you count calculated ratios). You get 17 plain-language health scores, a personalized action plan, and an AI concierge you can actually chat with about your results instead of staring at a wall of red and green numbers. That combination, at that price, is why it tends to win for the average reader.
The math is simple. Against Mito, Superpower is generally cheaper for a comparable 100-plus-marker panel. Against Function, you give up the second yearly draw and roughly 60 extra markers, but you save about $166 a year. For most people building a once-a-year baseline, that trade lands in Superpower’s favor.
The honest caveats
Two things to know. First, if you live in New York or New Jersey, Superpower costs $399 instead of $199 because of state lab rules, which narrows the price gap considerably; in those two states the decision gets closer and Function’s extra depth is worth a harder look. Second, Superpower is a screening and tracking service, not a diagnostic clinic, so it is built to flag and track, not to diagnose.
Full-body lab membership: 100+ biomarkers, doctor-reviewed, tracked over time.
Function vs Mito Health: the head-to-head most people are really asking
Strip Superpower out for a second, because plenty of searches for function vs mito health are a straight two-way decision. Here the answer is cleaner than the marketing makes it sound. Function gives you more markers (160-plus vs 100-plus), two draws a year instead of one, and a built-in 6-month retest. Mito gives you a slicker AI-native front end and strong longevity framing.
So in mito vs function health terms: pick Function if your priority is clinical completeness and trend data across the year. Pick Mito if the AI-coaching experience and the longevity-first presentation are what will actually get you to use the product. Just know that on raw panel depth, Function is ahead, and on price, neither beats Superpower’s $199 entry point in most states.
How to choose: a quick decision guide
Match the service to what you are actually trying to do.
Choose Superpower if you want one strong annual baseline, plain-language scores, AI coaching, and the lowest price among the three (outside NY and NJ). This is the default pick for most health-conscious adults.
Choose Function Health if you want the deepest panel, twice-yearly draws, and a built-in retest, and you are comfortable paying $365 for that thoroughness.
Choose Mito Health if the AI-native experience and longevity-first framing are the deciding factor for you, and the pricing checks out when you look at it directly.
One safety note that applies to all three: these are screening and wellness tools, not a diagnosis. Any result that falls outside the normal range should be reviewed with a licensed clinician before you act on it.
Related reading on Vital Signs Today
- Mito Health Cost: What You Actually Pay in 2026
- Is Mito Health Legit and Worth It? (2026)
- Mito Health Review (2026): Concierge Labs, Examined
- Superpower Blood Test Review (2026): Is It Worth the Membership?
Frequently asked questions
Is Mito Health or Function Health better?
It depends on what you weigh most. In the mito health vs function health comparison, Function Health is the more clinically thorough option with 160-plus biomarkers, two draws a year, and a 6-month retest for $365. Mito Health leans into an AI-native experience and longevity framing with a 100-plus marker panel. For sheer panel depth, Function wins; for the coaching experience, Mito makes its case. Many readers find Superpower is the better overall value than either.
Which is cheaper, Mito Health or Function Health?
Function Health is $365 per year. Mito Health’s pricing moves and should be confirmed on its own site, so we will not quote a precise number here. Either way, in this mito vs function health matchup, both typically cost more than Superpower’s $199-per-year membership (which rises to $399 in New York and New Jersey).
How does Superpower compare to Mito Health and Function Health?
Superpower covers 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 with calculated ratios), 17 health scores, an action plan, and an AI concierge for $199 a year. That is generally cheaper than both. You trade away Function’s second annual draw and its larger 160-plus marker count, but for a once-a-year baseline most people do not need that extra depth.
Do any of these services replace seeing a doctor?
No. Mito Health, Function Health, and Superpower are all screening and tracking services, not diagnostic clinics. They are great for spotting trends and building a baseline, but any out-of-range result should be reviewed with a licensed clinician who can order follow-up testing and make a diagnosis.
Is a 100-plus biomarker panel enough, or do I need 160-plus?
For most health-conscious adults, a well-chosen 100-plus marker panel like Superpower’s covers the metabolic, cardiovascular, hormonal, and nutrient markers that drive everyday decisions. The 160-plus markers in Function Health add value if you want maximum coverage or are tracking something specific, but more markers are not automatically better if you are not going to act on them.
