Disclosure: Vital Signs Today may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our evidence-based assessments. We are not a medical provider; talk to a clinician before acting on test results.
Quick answer: In the Mito Health vs Function Health debate, both are AI-driven, longevity-focused blood-testing services that test 100-plus biomarkers and hand you an action plan, with Function Health being the more clinically thorough of the two. But if you are choosing among all three, Superpower is the one we point most readers to: it covers 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 counting calculated ratios), gives you 17 plain-language health scores plus an AI concierge, and costs $199 per year, which undercuts both Mito and Function while still delivering a real yearly baseline.
Disclosure: Vital Signs Today may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our evidence-based assessments. We are not a medical provider; talk to a clinician before acting on test results.
| Service | Best for | Pricing | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superpower | Whole-body optimization | ~$179/yr membership | View › |
| Function Health | Annual deep panel | Annual membership | View › |
Mito Health vs Function Health vs Superpower at a glance
| Feature | Mito Health | Function Health | Superpower |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$349/yr | $365/yr | $199/yr ($399 NY & NJ) |
| Biomarkers | 100+ | 160+ | 100+ (~150 with ratios) |
| Draws per year | 1 draw | 2 draws + urinalysis | 1 annual draw |
| Standout | Longevity slant, concierge | 6-month retest, clinician-reviewed | 17 health scores + action plan + AI concierge |
| Best for | Longevity-focused repeat users | Most clinically thorough | Best-value full-body baseline |
Mito Health vs Function Health vs Superpower at a glance
The simplest way to actually get this done
Superpower is a full-body lab membership that runs 100+ biomarkers, has each result reviewed by a doctor, and tracks your numbers year over year (about $199/year). It is what we point readers to when they would rather get one clean, complete draw than chase single tests one at a time. Here is superpower reviewed in full.
All three services sell the same core promise: skip the rushed annual physical, draw a wide panel of biomarkers once or twice a year, and let software translate the numbers into something you can act on. The differences come down to price, how deep the panel goes, and how good the coaching layer feels.
Here is the short version before we get into each one. Function Health is the most clinically exhaustive and the priciest. Mito Health leans hard into longevity framing and an AI-native experience. Superpower is the value play that still hits the marks most people actually need from a yearly check, and it is the one we recommend for the average health-conscious adult.
One thing worth saying up front, because the marketing on all three sites blurs it: the number of biomarkers is the least useful way to compare these services. A panel of 100 markers that you actually understand and re-test on a schedule will change your health more than a panel of 200 markers that lands in your inbox once and gets forgotten. So as you read the sections below, weigh three things in this order: does the panel cover the systems that matter for your age and history, does the service make you come back for a second draw, and does the coaching layer turn numbers into a next step. Price is real, but it is the fourth question, not the first.
What do these 100-plus biomarkers actually measure?
When any of these services says “100-plus biomarkers,” they are not testing 100 unrelated things. The panel clusters into a handful of systems, and knowing the clusters is the fastest way to judge whether a service is testing what you personally need.
Metabolic and blood sugar. Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, hemoglobin A1c, and often a calculated insulin-resistance score like HOMA-IR. This cluster is where the earliest, most reversible warning signs of trouble show up, often years before a standard physical flags anything. If you only care about one group, this is usually it.
Cardiovascular and lipids. Beyond the basic cholesterol panel (total, LDL, HDL, triglycerides), the better services add ApoB, lipoprotein(a), and an inflammatory marker like hs-CRP. ApoB in particular is the number cardiologists increasingly treat as the truest read on heart risk, and its presence is a good signal that a panel was designed by someone who reads the current literature rather than the 1990s one.
Hormones and thyroid. TSH, free T3, free T4, and often thyroid antibodies, plus sex hormones (testosterone, estradiol, SHBG) and sometimes cortisol and DHEA-S. This cluster explains a huge share of “I did everything right and still feel tired” complaints.
Nutrients and vitamins. Ferritin and full iron studies, vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate, and magnesium. These are cheap to test, easy to fix, and shockingly often out of range in otherwise healthy adults.
Organ function and blood count. A complete blood count plus liver enzymes (ALT, AST, GGT) and kidney markers (creatinine, eGFR, BUN). This is the safety-net layer that catches the quieter problems.
All three services cover these five clusters. Function adds the most breadth on top, Superpower and Mito hit the essentials in each cluster. If a service left a whole cluster out, that would be the red flag. None of these three do.
Mito Health: the AI-native longevity pitch
What Mito Health does well
Mito Health positions itself as an AI-native clinic in your pocket. It tests 100-plus biomarkers through a standard lab draw at national lab locations, then returns a personalized dashboard, a biological-age style readout, and an action plan, usually within about a week. The product is built around longevity and healthspan rather than disease diagnosis, which is the same lane Superpower and Function play in.
The experience is genuinely well built. You book a draw at a partner lab, the concierge layer nudges you if a result needs attention, and the dashboard is one of the cleaner ones in the category. For someone who has never tracked their own labs and finds a raw PDF from Quest intimidating, that hand-holding has real value. Mito also leans into a longevity readout that frames your results as a biological-age style story rather than a list of pass or fail flags, which some users find far more motivating than a wall of reference ranges.
Where Mito Health falls short
Mito sits in a crowded middle. Per-kit and membership pricing in this category moves often, so check Mito directly for current pricing rather than trusting a number you read in a comparison post. Our honest read: Mito is a fine product, but it does not clearly out-test Function or clearly under-price Superpower, which makes it a harder service to recommend first. If the AI-coaching experience is the thing you care about most, it is worth a look. If you care about price-per-biomarker or clinical depth, the other two make a stronger case.
The other honest caveat is the one that applies to every AI-native health product right now: the coaching is only as good as the human review sitting behind it. An AI concierge that explains your ferritin in plain English is useful. An AI concierge that quietly reassures you about a result a doctor would have flagged is a liability. Mito does route abnormal results toward clinician attention, but if physician oversight is your top priority, Function’s clinician-reviewed model is more explicit about it. Read the fine print on who actually signs off on your results before you decide the coaching layer is enough.
Function Health: the most thorough panel
What Function Health does well
Function Health is the depth champion of this group. For $365 per year you get 160-plus biomarkers, two blood draws per year, a urinalysis, and a 6-month retest built into the membership. That second draw matters more than people expect: a single snapshot tells you where you stand, but two draws six months apart start to show you trend lines, which is the whole point of tracking biomarkers over time.
Where Function Health falls short
You pay for that thoroughness. At $365 it is the most expensive of the three, and its AI chat layer is newer and less mature than the coaching experience some competitors lead with. For a data-hungry user who genuinely wants 160-plus markers and twice-yearly draws, Function is the right call. For someone who wants a solid annual baseline without the premium, it can be more service than they need. We dig deeper into this in our Function Health review and our breakdown of Function Health cost.
There is also a subtler cost to more markers that nobody in this industry likes to mention: more markers mean more results that land just outside the reference range by chance, and each of those can send an anxious user down a rabbit hole of follow-up tests that were never needed. A 160-plus panel is a gift for someone who will interpret it calmly with a clinician and a burden for someone who panics at a single low-normal value. Know which of those two people you are before you buy the biggest panel available. The extra draw and the retest are where Function’s real value sits, more than the raw marker count.
Who Function is genuinely the right pick for
Function earns its premium in a few specific cases. If you have a family history you are actively watching, if you are managing a condition where the trend over six months tells you whether a change is working, or if you simply want the most complete picture money can reasonably buy without going to a specialty clinic, the two draws and the retest are worth the extra spend. It is the closest thing in this group to a real longitudinal record.
Superpower: the value pick that still covers the bases
Why we recommend it most often
Superpower is a $199-per-year membership that buys you one comprehensive annual blood draw covering 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 once you count calculated ratios). You get 17 plain-language health scores, a personalized action plan, and an AI concierge you can actually chat with about your results instead of staring at a wall of red and green numbers. That combination, at that price, is why it tends to win for the average reader.
The math is simple. Against Mito, Superpower is generally cheaper for a comparable 100-plus-marker panel. Against Function, you give up the second yearly draw and roughly 60 extra markers, but you save about $166 a year. For most people building a once-a-year baseline, that trade lands in Superpower’s favor.
The 17 health scores are the part that quietly does the most work. Instead of leaving you to interpret 100 raw values, Superpower groups them into readable categories like heart, metabolic, thyroid, and nutrients, and scores each one. That turns a daunting spreadsheet into a short list of “these two areas need attention, the rest are fine,” which is exactly the translation most people need to actually change a habit. The AI concierge then lets you ask follow-up questions in plain language, so a low vitamin D reading comes with a next step instead of a shrug.
The honest caveats
Two things to know. First, if you live in New York or New Jersey, Superpower costs $399 instead of $199 because of state lab rules, which narrows the price gap considerably; in those two states the decision gets closer and Function’s extra depth is worth a harder look. Second, Superpower is a screening and tracking service, not a diagnostic clinic, so it is built to flag and track, not to diagnose.
A third, smaller point: Superpower gives you one draw a year, not two. That is plenty for building and maintaining a baseline, but if you are mid-experiment (a new medication, an aggressive diet change, a training block) and you want to see the effect in six months rather than twelve, you will either pay for an extra draw or accept the annual cadence. For most readers that is a non-issue. For the tinkerers, it is the single reason to look harder at Function.
Full-body lab membership: 100+ biomarkers, doctor-reviewed, tracked over time.
Function vs Mito Health: the head-to-head most people are really asking
Strip Superpower out for a second, because plenty of searches for function vs mito health are a straight two-way decision. Here the answer is cleaner than the marketing makes it sound. Function gives you more markers (160-plus vs 100-plus), two draws a year instead of one, and a built-in 6-month retest. Mito gives you a slicker AI-native front end and strong longevity framing.
So in mito vs function health terms: pick Function if your priority is clinical completeness and trend data across the year. Pick Mito if the AI-coaching experience and the longevity-first presentation are what will actually get you to use the product. Just know that on raw panel depth, Function is ahead, and on price, neither beats Superpower’s $199 entry point in most states.
How to choose: a quick decision guide
Match the service to what you are actually trying to do.
Choose Superpower if you want one strong annual baseline, plain-language scores, AI coaching, and the lowest price among the three (outside NY and NJ). This is the default pick for most health-conscious adults.
Choose Function Health if you want the deepest panel, twice-yearly draws, and a built-in retest, and you are comfortable paying $365 for that thoroughness.
Choose Mito Health if the AI-native experience and longevity-first framing are the deciding factor for you, and the pricing checks out when you look at it directly.
One safety note that applies to all three: these are screening and wellness tools, not a diagnosis. Any result that falls outside the normal range should be reviewed with a licensed clinician before you act on it.
Three real-world scenarios
The abstract comparison only gets you so far. Here is how the decision usually shakes out for three common types of buyer.
The 34-year-old who has never tracked labs. No family history they are worried about, just a growing sense that they should know their numbers. They do not need 160 markers and a twice-yearly cadence. They need a clean, complete first draw, a plain-language read, and a price that does not sting. Superpower at $199 is the obvious start. Next year, if a single marker looked off, they retest and watch it move.
The 48-year-old managing a real risk. A parent had early heart disease, their last ApoB was borderline, and they have started a statin. This person benefits from Function’s two draws and six-month retest, because the entire question is whether the intervention is working, and you can only answer that with a before and an after inside the same year. Here the extra $166 buys information that actually changes decisions.
The optimizer who lives in the dashboard. They love a clean interface, they want the biological-age framing, and the coaching experience is what will keep them engaged. Mito speaks their language. As long as the pricing checks out when they look at it directly, and they treat any flag as a prompt to see a clinician rather than a diagnosis, it is a reasonable pick.
What to do after you get your results
Whichever service you choose, the report is the start, not the finish. Three rules keep you out of trouble. First, do not act on a single out-of-range value in isolation; labs vary, a bad night of sleep or a hard workout the day before can nudge markers, and one reading is a snapshot, not a trend. Second, take anything flagged red to a licensed clinician who can order a confirmatory test before you change medication or supplements. Third, decide your retest cadence in advance. If a marker was fine, once a year is plenty. If a marker was borderline and you are working on it, three to six months is the window where you will actually see whether your change moved the needle. That retest discipline, more than the size of the original panel, is what turns a blood test into better health.
Related reading on Vital Signs Today
- Mito Health Cost: What You Actually Pay in 2026
- Is Mito Health Legit and Worth It? (2026)
- Mito Health Review (2026): Concierge Labs, Examined
- Superpower Blood Test Review (2026): Is It Worth the Membership?
Frequently asked questions
Is Mito Health or Function Health better?
It depends on what you weigh most. In the mito health vs function health comparison, Function Health is the more clinically thorough option with 160-plus biomarkers, two draws a year, and a 6-month retest for $365. Mito Health leans into an AI-native experience and longevity framing with a 100-plus marker panel. For sheer panel depth, Function wins; for the coaching experience, Mito makes its case. Many readers find Superpower is the better overall value than either.
Which is cheaper, Mito Health or Function Health?
Function Health is $365 per year. Mito Health’s pricing moves and should be confirmed on its own site, so we will not quote a precise number here. Either way, in this mito vs function health matchup, both typically cost more than Superpower’s $199-per-year membership (which rises to $399 in New York and New Jersey).
How does Superpower compare to Mito Health and Function Health?
Superpower covers 100-plus biomarkers (about 150 with calculated ratios), 17 health scores, an action plan, and an AI concierge for $199 a year. That is generally cheaper than both. You trade away Function’s second annual draw and its larger 160-plus marker count, but for a once-a-year baseline most people do not need that extra depth.
Do any of these services replace seeing a doctor?
No. Mito Health, Function Health, and Superpower are all screening and tracking services, not diagnostic clinics. They are great for spotting trends and building a baseline, but any out-of-range result should be reviewed with a licensed clinician who can order follow-up testing and make a diagnosis.
Is a 100-plus biomarker panel enough, or do I need 160-plus?
For most health-conscious adults, a well-chosen 100-plus marker panel like Superpower’s covers the metabolic, cardiovascular, hormonal, and nutrient markers that drive everyday decisions. The 160-plus markers in Function Health add value if you want maximum coverage or are tracking something specific, but more markers are not automatically better if you are not going to act on them.
Do I need to fast before the blood draw?
For most of these panels, yes. Glucose, insulin, and the lipid markers are the ones most affected by a recent meal, so all three services generally ask you to fast for 8 to 12 hours and drink water beforehand. If you do not fast, your triglycerides and glucose can read artificially high and send you chasing a problem that is really just breakfast. Book a morning slot, keep the timing consistent from year to year, and note any medications you take, since some affect results. When in doubt, follow the specific instructions the service sends with your requisition.
How long do results take?
Once your blood is drawn, most of these services return a full dashboard within about a week, sometimes faster for the standard markers and a little slower for specialized ones. The draw itself is a normal venous blood draw at a partner lab location, not a home fingerstick, so quality is on par with what your doctor would order.
Can I use these results with my own doctor?
Yes, and you should for anything abnormal. All three give you the actual lab values, not just a score, so you can download the report and bring it to a clinician. A doctor may want to repeat an out-of-range result with their own requisition before acting on it, which is normal practice, not a knock on the service.
